Monday 5 August 2013

Apple launches third-party charger trade-in program

The power adapter swap comes on the heels of a death in China believed to have been linked to a counterfeit Apple USB power charger.In the wake of an electrocution in China reportedly linked to a third-party power adapter connected to an iPhone, Apple has launched a trade-in program to replace users' third-party chargers with its own.
Apple's power adapter.Noting that some third-party or counterfeit power adapters may be poorly designed and result in safety issues, Apple announced Monday that itsUSB Power Adapter Takeback Program will swap non-Apple chargers with its own for $10.
"Customer safety is a top priority at Apple," Apple said in a statement. "That's why all of our products -- including USB power adapters for iPhone, iPad, and iPod -- undergo rigorous testing for safety and reliability and are designed to meet government safety standards around the world."
Scrutiny of third-party and counterfeit chargers intensified last month after a 23-year-old Chinese woman was reportedly killed while answering a call on her iPhone 5, which is believed to have been connected to a third-party USB charger. In a separate incident, a 30-year-old man in Beijing was shocked while plugging his iPhone 4 into a third-party charger, leaving him in a coma for several days.Beginning August 16, iPhone, iPad, or iPod users can drop third-party chargers at an Apple Retail Store or Apple Authorized Service Provider and pay $10 for an Apple USB adapter, which usually retails for $19. Apple said users' old adapters will be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way.
The deal runs through October 18 and is limited to one trade-in per device. To qualify, iPhone, iPad, or iPod users must bring their device with them at the time of trade-in to verify the serial number.

Motorola Moto X

Motorola Moto X



Sunday 4 August 2013

Microsoft cuts Surface Pro tablet prices by $100

Discounts come just days after the tech titan reveals that marketing the tablets has cost more than the revenue they have brought inMicrosoft reduced the price of its Surface Pro tablet this weekend by $100, a few days after revealing that it has spent more money on marketing the in-house tablet than it has generated in revenue.
The reductions, which were first reported by The Verge, cuts the price of Microsoft's 64GB and 128GB tablets to $799 and $899, respectively. The discounts come three weeks after Microsoftcut the price of its Surface RT tablets by 30 percent.Sales of Surface RT tablets, which debuted last October, have been seen as tepid. The tech titan revealed on Tuesday that it hasearned $853 million in revenue from its Surface tablets since their debut last fall. However, that is less than the $900 million the company had to pay for Surface RT inventory adjustments and also less than the $898 million Microsoft paid for Windows 8 and Surface advertising.
Even though Microsoft revealed its revenue from the Surface tablets, it did not release the number of units sold or specify the individual revenue from either the Surface RT or the Surface Pro. In March, Bloomberg reported that Microsoft likely sold around 1.5 million Surface tablets to date. Though 1 million of those sales were for the RT version, that number was about half of what Microsoft initially expected, according to Bloomberg.
In comparison, Apple reported last month that it sold 14.6 million iPads in the last quarter alone.

Obama vetoes Apple sales ban in U.S.

Obama vetoes Apple sales ban in U.S.

The Obama Administration has vetoed a decision by the U.S. International Trade Commission that would have led to a sales ban on older iPhones and iPads.In an unexpected move, the Obama administration vetoed an earlier ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission that would have resulted in a sales ban of some older Apple devices.
That ban, set to formally begin Monday, was decided in early June after Samsung accused Apple of infringing on its patents. The president had 60 days to review the decision and intervene, something that hadn't happened with an ITC decision since 1987.
In the veto, sent to ITC Chairman Irving Williamson by U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, Froman said he disapproved of the earlier ruling, and had based that decision on the effect it had on "competitive conditions in the U.S. economy and the effect on U.S. consumers." In particular, Froman said the U.S. needed to pay close attention to standards essential patents and their licensing in order to promote "innovation and economic progress."
"We are disappointed that the U.S. Trade Representative has decided to set aside the exclusion order issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission," Samsung said following the decision. "The ITC's decision correctly recognized that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith and that Apple remains unwilling to take a license."
"We applaud the administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case," Apple said in a statement. "Samsung was wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.Samsung's ITC victory centered on a wireless communications patent that covered technology found in some older iPhones and cellular-enabled iPads. That includes iPhones prior to the iPhone 4S made for AT&T's network, as well as 3G-enabled versions of the iPad 1 and 2. Some of those models were still being sold by Apple and its carrier partners.
Technology companies in recent years have increasingly turned to the ITC to settle their disputes. Companies can pursue an ITC case in parallel with civil lawsuits, and the threat of an embargo on products typically forces companies to settle more quickly.
Many legal experts believed next week's ban would go into effect without the Obama administration stepping in, citing a lack of any presidential interventions in ITC decisions for the past 26 years. That includes a legal spat between Broadcom and Qualcomm in 2007 that could have had a much broader impact on the mobile device landscape, and that was sorted out after the two companies settled.
Regardless of this latest decision, next week is still a big one for the two companies, which continue to duke it out. On Friday, August 9, the two companies head to court for oral arguments on permanent injunctions from the trial that wrapped up last August. The ITC also said it plans to release on the 9th its final ruling on whether Samsung infringed on Apple's patents. That's part of a separate case Apple filed in July 2011, and could result in a sales ban on some older Samsung phones and tablets.
You can read Froman's full letter below:

U.S. letter on Apple sales in U.S.

Saturday 3 August 2013

Wi-Fi routers: More security risks than ever

The research team that discovered significant security holes in more than a dozen home Wi-Fi routers adds more devices to that list at Defcon 21.LAS VEGAS -- More major brand-name Wi-Fi router vulnerabilities continue to be discovered, and continue to go unpatched, a security researcher has revealed at Defcon 21.
Jake Holcomb, a security researcher at the Baltimore, Md.-based firm Independent Security Evaluators and the lead researcher into Wi-Fi router vulnerabilities, said that problem is worse than when ISE released its original findings in April.
The latest study continues to show that the small office and home office Wi-Fi routers are "very vulnerable to attack," Holcomb said.They're not a means to protect your network and your digital assets," he cautioned.
Holcomb is a relatively young researcher, in his mid-20s, who turned his lifelong interest in computer security into a professional career only in the past year. Previously, he was doing network security for a school district in Ohio.
The new report details 56 new Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, or CVEs, that Holcomb and the other ISE researchers have found in popular routers. These include the Asus RT-AC66U, D-Link DIR-865L, and TrendNet TEW-812DRU, for which Holcomb plans on demonstrating vulnerabilities at Defcon on Saturday and Sunday.
Requests for comment from the affected vendors were not immediately returned. CNET will update this story when we hear from them.
You might not think that the router security holes could affect you, or would be easy to exploit, but Holcomb explained that because the vulnerabilities appear to affect most routers, and are hard to fix, these could put nearly every person who connects to a vulnerable router at risk.
The scenario he explained from the noisy hallways of the Rio Convention Center here was a common one. Small-business and home Wi-Fi router administration often employs weak passwords, or static passwords that are the same across multiple stores, like a Starbucks.
The Asus RT-AC66U, one of the routers that has been discovered to have vulnerabilities.
(Credit: Dong Ngo)
All an attacker has to do is go to his favorite Seattle-based coffee joint, buy a venti latte and a low-fat pumpkin ginger muffin, and get the establishment's Wi-Fi password. Then, equipped with access to the Wi-Fi network, all that attacker would have to do is use one of the exploits that ISE has uncovered. The router would be compromised, including all the Web traffic flowing through it.
Holcomb compared the problem of fixing routers to traditional PCs. "In most cases, automatic updates are enabled for Windows and Mac," he said. But, he added, "even if a router manufacturer were to implement a similar feature, most people don't log into their routers."
Basically, because people have been trained to think of the router as a set-it-and-forget-it device, and one without security flaws, it's nearly impossible to get them to update router firmware.
The TrendNet TEW-812DRU, another of the routers that has been discovered to have vulnerabilities.
(Credit: Dong Ngo/CNET)
The fix won't be an easy one, at least not logistically. "I think the solution is for routers to automatically update, and give users the ability to opt out of it," Holcomb said. But given the reluctance of some major router manufacturers to address the problems, these exploits could exist unpatched in the wild for years to come.
Holcomb said that while TP-Link fixed all the vulnerabilities that ISE reported to it, D-Link has never responded. And Linksys, he said, chose not to repair many of the vulnerabilities reported to it.
In the case of the Linksys EA-6500, someone can place their own code in the router's configuration file and overwrite it. "It's an attack that relies heavily on social engineering," said Holcomb, "but it's an example of the vendors not resolving a vulnerability. Why [not], I don't know."
Under the guidelines of responsible disclosure, Holcomb says that ISE notified all router manufacturers of the vulnerabilities discovered before going public with them, giving them a chance to fix them.
The D-Link DIR-865L, also discovered to have vulnerabilties.
(Credit: D-Link)
Holcomb will be demonstrating how to take control of three different routers using a different vulnerability in each.
For the aforementioned Asus router, he plans to demonstrate a buffer overflow exploit; for the D-Link he plans to use Web-based and SIM link directory traversal exploits; and he will attack the TrendNet router using a cross-site scripting forgery and command injection exploit.
"All three give us a root shell," he said, meaning access to the router's lowest levels of code.
Holcomb will be speaking at Defcon's Wall of Sheep Speaker Workshop on Saturday from 3 to 4 p.m. PT, and at the conference's Wireless Village on Sunday.

Friday 2 August 2013

Could the future of Glass and wearables be hidden in Moto X?

Motorola's latest phone has always-on voice connectivity, much like Google Glass. Maybe it's a hint at where Google's connected future is really heading.Motorola's long-anticipated Moto X phone was unveiled yesterday amid much anticipation: would Google's ownership craft a new direction for Motorola? Would the phone be able to stand out from the crowd? And would it be sold with a Moto watch?
The watch rumor, born out of Motorola's previous history in smartwatches and, perhaps, the recent mania in watch tech, didn't come true. But the Moto X might have more interesting wearable ideas up its sleeve.The Moto X features an "always listening" voice-command technology that taps into Google Now and works completely hands-free. "OK, Google Now," Motorola executives demonstrated, making phone calls and looking up appointments. It sounds a lot like Siri, but it sounds even more like my earlier experiences with Google Glass.
Google Glass, something most people can't even get their hands on, is a very smart camera, but it's also an embodiment of an always-on Google connection. So is the Moto X.
What if Glass is a technology vehicle more than a product? Could the Moto X -- coming out in a month -- be the beginning of that always-on Google product before Glass? And could it even represent where Glass might be morphing toward? Add a few extra wearable peripherals, and suddenly the idea doesn't seem so far-fetched.OK, phone: Do everything 
At Google I/O, voice-controlled Google services much like what the Moto X delivers were demonstrated on Chrome browsers. But it was Glass that started the "OK, Google" style of speak-to-your-device connectivity and made it interesting.
One of the chief features of the Moto X is its always-on voice connectivity, enabling you to speak requests much like Siri or Google Now currently allow, but without pressing any buttons at all. If you choose to, the Moto X simply listens, with finely tuned microphones that can hear you across a room. It'll even listen through a pocket.
If you're thinking of it in a car, or in a room, it sounds like an always-connected speakerphone. But I'm more interested in the idea of the Moto X in your pocket as you walk around.
It's not the first Motorola phone to adopt this idea: the Droid Maxx, Mini, and Ultra have similar touch-free voice features, too. But, the Moto X might be the phone most people associate the technology with. Could always-on listening be the start of a trend? Maybe, if the right kinds of headsets and software are made to deliver smart information back at you.
Audio augmented reality, versus a screen on your face?
Forget barking on a speakerphone and imagine a headset. Maybe it has good noise-canceling technology. Now you're speaking to your phone, much like you'd do with Siri, but with no button to activate.
That could be the start of a nightmare for some people, but the more interesting part of the equation could be if that always-on connectivity also delivered audio cues to your ear, delivering location-specific details in the same way a head-up display would without distracting your eyes. Location-aware apps and services could trigger information such as traffic alerts, sports scores, or flight arrival time changes, all spoken.
Maybe your phone could tell you a prescription was ready, or remind you when you're in a store that the shoes you like are on sale. Or maybe it says your friend's in the bar you're at, and tells you to look for him.
I imagine it as an auditory augmented reality, the equivalent of those little earbuds worn by agents in "The Matrix."
What if a wearable camera like the Looxcie could be controlled by an always-on voice connection?
(Credit: Andrew Hoyle/CNET)
Future peripherals?
Motorola is keen to emphasize the Moto X as a hands-free device. Motorola's executives also explained that the Moto X will work with a "trusted Bluetooth device" to be part of that always-listening experience.
A headset would make the most sense, considering Motorola's background. Executives at the Moto X event acknowledged that connection, and did nothing to dissuade my thinking. Right now, that voice recognition service is best imagined with a headset.
But could there be more in store? A watch, like the one that was rumored alongside the Moto X, or maybe even a wearable camera headset? If you connected a camera and were able to voice-control recording, how different would it really be from Glass?
Wearables without the screen
You'd lack that distinctive, floating display of Google Glass in the scenarios I'm imagining, but that seems OK by me. A lot of wearable tech is about far more-discreet systems of notification: watches, little activity sensors, or earpieces.
As I said earlier this week, all of wearable tech must find a way to make itself more useful than a phone, arguably the most critical piece of semi-wearable tech you're likely to own. The Moto X's mission to stay in your pocket and remain unseen could be the future trend of all phones: being invisible, wireless hubs, linking to accessories that help it do our bidding completely unseen.
Maybe the Moto X is just one more small step in that direction.

DOJ proposes ways to halt Apple e-book price-fixing

Apple would need to pay for an external monitor, sever deals with publishers, and let Amazon and Barnes & Noble link their iOS e-book apps to their respective online stores, among other proposed measures.Following a court ruling last month that Apple conspired to fix prices of digital books, the Department of Justice on Friday proposed measures "intended to halt Apple's anticompetitive conduct, restore lost competition, and prevent a recurrence of the illegal activities."
The measures are still subject to court approval and may not be adopted in full.Among the measures, Apple would need to let other e-book retailers like Amazon and Barnes & Noble provide links to their respective e-bookstores from their iOS apps, "allowing consumers who purchase and read e-books on their iPads and iPhones easily to compare Apple's prices with those of its competitors."
In addition, Apple would need to end its agreements with the five major publishers linked to the conspiracy -- Hachette, HarperCollins, Holtzbrinck (also known as Macmillan), Penguin, and Simon & Schuster. (Disclosure: Simon & Schuster is owned by CBS, which is the parent company of  IEn.)
Apple would be prevented from "entering into contracts that would, in any way, fix the price that any of its competitors charge for content." The company would also need to refrain for five years from "accepting limitations on its own ability to price-compete with respect to e-books."
Likewise, Apple could not funnel information among the conspiring publishers and couldn't retaliate against them for refusing to set prices.
The department also asked for an external monitor, paid for by Apple, to oversee Apple's internal antitrust compliance policies.
The proposed remedies are in line with what the Department of Justice has said it would ask for. The court will hold a hearing on proposed remedies on August 9.
Last month in a quick decision, a federal judge ruled that Apple had conspired to fix e-books prices, handing the U.S. government a major win.
IEN-News will update this story as we learn more.

Tuesday 30 July 2013


Facebook skyrockets back to within cents of IPO price

After a tumultuous year, the social network's blossoming mobile business has finally made believers out of skeptics.facebook hacker squareFourteen months after listing on the Nasdaq, Facebook has finally circled back to within striking distance of its initial offering price of $38 a share.
Facebook opened Tuesday at $35.65 a share, already up more than 34 percent since it reported stellar second-quarter earnings last week. The social network's shares continued to climb higher on the back of news that Facebook has added another revenue stream that will help it capitalize on its ballooning mobile audience.
The social network reached $37.61 a share by market close on Tuesday, up more than 6 percent for the day and marking the first time Facebook has traded at close to the same value as its IPO price since its market debut in May 18, 2012.
Facebook's return to glory has taken more than year, but the past week has proved the most consequential. The company's stock finally popped last week when Facebook announced that it earned 19 cents per share on $1.81 billion in revenue during the second quarter. Facebook's earnings report astounded investors and analysts alike as it revealed that the social network had managed to make 41 percent of its advertising revenue from its year-old mobile business.Now, Facebook is being further uplifted by the promise of additional revenue from the 819 million monthly active users of its mobile applications. The social network revealed that, as expected, it would act as a mobile games publisher for small and medium-size application developers wanting to reach larger audiences. The new Mobile Games Publishing program means that Facebook will take a cut of revenue from mobile game makers who turn to the social network for distribution.
Facebook's remarkable gains are especially good news for CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who holds 425 million vested shares and has 60 million additional options. In September, the Facebook chief promised not to sell his shares for at least 12 months as a way to instill investor confidence in the company's then-slumping stock. At the time, Facebook's shares had reached a low of $17.73. Now with Facebook near $38 a share again, Zuckerberg's decision seems especially prudent as his holdings are worth more than double what they were 11 months ago

Monday 29 July 2013


Low-cost iPhone named in China Labor Watch report

A report citing worker abuse at Apple supplier Pegatron mentions rumored iPhone with plastic coverProof of Apple's much-rumored, low-cost iPhone might have been revealed inadvertently in a new report.
Released today by watchdog group China Labor Watch, the report accuses Apple supplier Pegatron of several worker abuses, including safety violations, poor living conditions, and excessive overtime.
Page 11 of the 62-page report describes Pegatron as assembling cell phones and tablets for Apple. "Its assembled products include iPhone 4, iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, and low-priced plastic iPhones," the report said.
The long, difficult day in the life of one factory worker is detailed further in the report. Page 28 describes that worker's task with the plastic iPhone:
Today's work is to paste protective film on the iPhone's plastic back cover to prevent it from being scratched on assembly lines. This iPhone model with a plastic cover will soon be released on the market by Apple. The task is pretty easy, and I was able to work independently after a five-minute instruction from a veteran employee. It took around a minute to paste protective film on one rear cover. The new cell phone has not yet been put into mass production, so quantity is not as important.
The report's purpose apparently was to find out how a low-cost iPhone can be produced.
The executive summary specifically states: "Apple is preparing to release a cheap iPhone. Just how does a prosperous company like Apple produce a discounted version of its phones?" Another question asks: "So what is the competitive advantage that Pegatron has utilized to win Apple's order of the cheap iPhone?"
The report blames some of the violations on the rush to create a cheaper iPhone:
At this moment, in Shanghai, China, workers in Apple's supplier factory Pegatron are monotonously working long overtime hours to turn out a scaled-back, less expensive version of the iPhone. Six days a week, the workers making these phones have to work almost 11-hour shifts, 20 minutes of which is unpaid, and the remainder of which is paid at a rate of $1.50 an hour ($268 per month) before overtime. This is less than half the average local monthly income of $764 and far below the basic living wage necessary to live in Shanghai, one of costliest cities in China. So these workers rely on long overtime hours. If a worker does not finish three months at Pegatron, the dispatch company that got the worker hired will deduct a large portion of his wages.
The report goes on to highlight the labor violations claimed by China Labor Watch, which sent investigators to three Pegatron factories to conduct almost 200 interviews with workers from March to July.China Labor Watch said it found at least 86 labor rights violations, including 36 legal violations and 50 ethical violations, across 15 categories: dispatch labor abuse, hiring discrimination, women's rights violations, underage labor, contract violations, insufficient worker training, excessive working hours, insufficient wages, poor working conditions, poor living conditions, difficulty in taking leave, labor health and safety concerns, ineffective grievance channels, abuse by management, and environmental pollution.
In response to the report, Apple sent a statement to The Wall Street Journal in which it said it has been in contact with China Labor Watch to investigate the allegations. Pegatron CEO Jason Cheng said: "We will investigate [the allegations] fully and take immediate actions to correct any violations to Chinese labor laws and our own code of conduct."

First look at the BMW i3 electric car


First look at the BMW i3 electric carBMW i3For the amount of fanfare and effort BMW gave to its i3 electric car, I would have expected something at least nearly competitive with the Tesla Model S. But BMW's vision for a clean, futuristic urban vehicle doesn't reach far beyond what has already been put on the market by Nissan, Mitsubishi, Ford, and Honda, at least when it comes to raw performance numbers.

With an electric vehicle, performance primarily means range. BMW estimates the i3 will go 80 to 100 miles between charges, putting it in the same class as the majority of electric cars launched in the last few years. From BMW's perspective, that range fits perfectly within the parameters it set out. As an urban vehicle, the i3 is meant to handle daily driving around a city. Especially in Europe, that range is more than adequate for the majority of people to make a daily commute and run errands.
That sort of range is a tougher sell in the U.S., even if most people don't actually drive further on a daily basis.
When it comes to style, the i3 may not fit the brand perception BMW has built up in the U.S. The i3 comes out as a premium small electric car, a five door hatchback. Small and premium remain uncomfortable partners in the minds of U.S. car buyers, although vehicles such as theLexus CT200h have begun to bridge that rift.The i3's hatchback style offers excellent utility, with the ability to carry four passengers and cargo. Adding to the utility of the i3 is the fact that BMW designed it from the ground up to be an electric car. As such, there are no intrusions into the cabin for legacy components such as a transmission. The cabin floor is flatter than in most gasoline cars, while BMW takes a minimalist approach to the dashboard. The result is equivalent cabin space to BMW's 3-series, despite the shorter overall length of the i3.
Similar to the i3 concept vehicle BMW displayed at the 2011 Frankfurt auto show, the production version uses carriage style doors, meaning the rear doors are rear-hinged. However, the production version uses a longer front door, so the rears are half-doors, similar to the Mazda RX-8 or Honda Element.
As a premium vehicle, the i3 shows off nicer interior materials than you would expect from the typical economy hatchback in the market. And BMW gives the i3's cabin a futuristic twist. Rather than an instrument cluster embedded into the dashboard in front of the driver, BMW carves out some of the extra dashboard space and sets up an LCD for all instrumentation display, kind of like a flatscreen TV standing atop a modern entertainment center.Likewise, stereo, phone, and navigation controls appear on another LCD panel sitting on the center of the dashboard. However, BMW keeps its standard iDrive controller mounted on a console between the front seats as an interface for the cabin tech features. In fact, current BMW owners with iDrive will find it easy to adapt to this version in the i3.
Adding to the idea that the i3 is a car of the future is its carbon fiber reinforced plastic body. BMW took great pains and a lot of investment to develop this high tech material for mass production. This body construction promises a lighter car, without sacrificing strength and safety, and is unique among the competition.
Despite the lightweight materials, though, the i3 doesn't get any better range than its electric competition, at least on paper. It makes you wonder why BMW went to all the trouble.
The electric drivetrain itself hasn't evolved much, at least when it comes to power and efficiency, than that which BMW released in its ActiveE vehicle. The ActiveE, based on the 1-series, is an electric vehicle that BMW offers for limited leasing, and is being used to gather performance data for electric drive technology.
The i3 gets a 22 kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack. Like the ActiveE, its electric motor drives the rear wheels and produces 170 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. That gets the i3 from zero to 62 mph in 7.2 seconds, a reasonable acceleration rate for most traffic situations, but not ground-breaking. Top speed is electronically limited to 93 mph.
Similar to the Tesla Model S, BMW activates braking regeneration when the driver merely lifts from the accelerator, slowing the car without applying the brakes. It makes for a different driving strategy than with a gasoline-powered car, one where most of the driving is done with the accelerator pedal, and very little with the brake pedal.
BMW says the i3 can be fitted with a range extender internal combustion engine, which would bring total range up to 186 miles. BMW has not specified which markets might offer the range extended version.
Battery recharge will take about 5 hours from a 240 volt source, or 30 minutes for an 80% charge from a DC fast charging station.
Selling points
With pricing at $41,000, the BMW i3 comes in slightly higher than its electric competition. Federal and state incentives can bring the total price down by almost $10,000. Although its technical specifications don't make it look much more attractive than other options, upscale buyers may be more attracted to the brand.
Test drives will be another factor. If the i3 holds up BMW's Ultimate Driving Machine mantra, it could win converts through a premium ride experience.