Sunday 11 August 2013

Former Microsoft VP thought dead after his plane crashes into Connecticut homes

Bill Henningsgaard, a former sales VP at the computing giant, is presumed dead, along with his 17-year-old son and two younger children, after his plane crashes into two homes while approaching an airport.A former Microsoft executive, along with his 17-year-old son and two younger children, are presumed dead after the man's small plane crashed into two Connecticut homes Friday.
Bill Henningsgaard, 54, held various marketing and sales positions at the computing giant -- including vice president of sales for the western United States, Australia, and New Zealand -- before leaving in the early 2000s to focus on philanthropy. He was on a trip to explore college options with his son when his plane went down while approaching Connecticut's Tweed New Haven airport. The cause of the crash has not yet been determined.
An East Haven Fire Department official told the Associated Press that four bodies -- two from the plane and two from one of the houses -- had been recovered. The bodies have yet to be identified by the medical examiner, but two children -- a 1-year-old and a 13-year-old -- have been missing since the plane crash.
Henningsgaard's brother told CNN there was no reason to think anyone other than Henningsgaard and his son were aboard the plane, and Social Venture Partners, a philanthropic organization that Henningsgaard worked with as a board member, posted an item on its blog Friday evening lamenting over Henningsgaard's death.
"Many of you know first-hand how the extraordinary and visionary leadership of Bill Henningsgaard was visible all over this community," reads the item from SVP, a group of partners who pool their money to have greater charitable impact on local nonprofits. "He worked tirelessly to build partnerships and facilitate efforts that put us on the path of engaging the community to actively support every child, step by step, from cradle to career. Bill walked the talk to make our community stronger."

How Roku can build a Chromecast killer

How Roku can build a Chromecast killer

Roku's streaming dongle hasn't caught fire like Chromecast. Here's what Roku can learn from Google's hot new streamerRoku Streaming Stick: the pre-Chromecast ChromecastGoogle has shaken up the world of streaming video with its new (and hard to get) Chromecast. The $35 unit effectively turns any "dumb" HDTV into a smart TV with Netflix and YouTube, and uses any iPhone, Android phone, or tablet as a remote.
Some pundits were quick to declare the ultra-affordable Chromecast the new top dog of the streaming media world ("Google's miracle device"), suggesting that it would leave current market leaders Apple TV and Roku as roadkill. While some of them made these declarations before actually using the product, there was no doubt from the level of general Web enthusiasm that Google was making consumers sit up and take notice. (The official CNET take: we like what the Chromecast has to offer for the price, but we feel that it needs some feature upgradesbefore it can be recommendable to a wider, non-techie audience.)
Somewhat lost in the Chromecast hullaballoo was the fact that Roku already has a Chromecast-like streaming dongle called the Roku Streaming Stick. It's basically the guts of theRoku 2 XS (the 2012 flagship Roku player, now discontinued and replaced by the Roku 3) crammed into a the form factor of -- you guessed it -- a stick.
Like the other Roku boxes, the Streaming Stick bests the Chromecast's meager built-in app selection with a panoply of channels including Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon Instant, Pandora, Crackle, Spotify, Vudu, and HBO Go -- to name just a handful of its hundreds of mainstream and niche offerings. But Roku seems to underplay the existence of the Streaming Stick -- it's tough to even find it on the company's website. But the frenzy over the Chromecast suggests to me that this would be a perfect time for Roku to revisit the Streaming Stick.
What follows are my suggestions to make a (theoretical) Roku Streaming Stick 2.0 a better product. The result might not be a full-on Chromecast killer, but it could be something that would at least be far better than the current model -- and possibly the best Roku to date.
1. Add a real YouTube app.
This is still the Achilles' heel of all of Roku's boxes, from the $50 Roku LT to the $100 Roku 3. Yes, using the free Twonky app on an Android or iOS device allows you to get any YouTube video on your TV via the Roku (ironically, using Chromecast-style mirroring). And yes, as a Roku rep pointed out to Gigaom, many of YouTube's key third-party video providers -- Machinima, Vevo, College Humor, and others -- are already available on Roku via their own apps. But a real YouTube app on Roku boxes would remove the asterisks and workarounds, and make things easier for real-world users. (Whether Google, YouTube's owner, wants to cooperate and make its video service available on Roku -- which is now, arguably, a hardware rival -- is tougher to answer.)
Roku remote control(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
2. Make the remote optional.
Chromecast doesn't have a dedicated remote. Instead, it uses the Netflix and YouTube apps already on your smartphone or tablet -- you just click an icon, and video from your handheld screen instead appears on your big-screen TV. Some people -- presumably, those of you who "watch TV" while simultaneously interacting with your Facebook or Twitter stream -- love this idea, and prefer your touch-screen controls to an old-fashioned clicker. While a smartphone screen is certainly a great way to search for and choose content, I still prefer the dedicated hard buttons of a real remote control.
The good news for Roku is that it already offers the best of both worlds. The company alreadyhas an Android and iOS remote app, so anyone who doesn't like the company's minimalist clicker can toss it in a drawer after initial setup. Roku could potentially work with other app providers -- Netflix, YouTube, whoever -- to add the "play to Roku" option that works identically to the existing Chromecast one.
The point is, so long as the Streaming Stick can work without the need for the hard remote, you can pull it out of the box and make it an optional add-on. Given that the current Roku remotesells separately for around $34, that would help get the Streaming Stick price closer to $50.
3. Add screen mirroring.
This one isn't a big deal for me, but I know that a lot of geeks some to love the Chromecast's screen mirroring function, which lets Macs and Windows PCs beam the contents of the laptop screen directly to the TV. (We found this beta feature to be less than 100 percent reliable when streaming video sites like Hulu on the Chromecast.)
Because it was already competing with Apple TV's nearly identical AirPlay functionality, Roku's remote apps feature a "Play on Roku" function that streams any music or photos on your phone to the TV. Roku just added video support to the iOS version, too. For now, it only works with self-shot video that's sitting on your iPhone. But if Roku has gotten that working, it makes me think that PC/Mac mirroring shouldn't be too hard to pull off, either.
Chromecast and the Roku Streaming Stick(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
4. Add USB power.
This is the big one. The Roku Streaming Stick is designed only to work with TVs that are equipped with MHL-capable (Mobile High-Definition Link) HDMI ports. Unlike standard HDMI, MHL ports provide enough power to charge connected mobile devices -- or, in this case, to keep the Roku Streaming Stick up and running, even when the input is powered off.
It's a nice idea -- the Roku is "always on," ready to be toggled on. (Otherwise, the Roku would have to go through its full reboot sequence whenever the TV was turned on -- no fun if you want to jump straight into a Netflix movie.) But the "feature" limits the Streaming Stick to only MHL-compatible TVs. You'll find more of them in 2013, but it's still not a widely supported feature, especially if your TV is more than a couple of years old.
Chromecast has an easy workaround: the dongle is powered by a micro-USB input, just like most cell phones. Sure, it's a bit unsightly -- no one wants more wires -- but it works like a charm. (Google throws a USB power adapter in the box, but many TVs also include a USB port with enough juice to power the Chromecast.)
If Roku were to adopt the same design change to the Streaming Stick -- just adding a USB power port -- it would effectively remove the product's biggest caveat. Instead of compatibility with just the handful of MHL TVs, it would work with nearly every HDTV on the market. That's how you get from niche to mainstream.
5. Lower the price.
Chromecast's biggest asset is its rock-bottom $35 price tag. That undercuts Roku's current low-end options, the $50 Roku LT and $60 Roku HD. (Those two units are nearly identical, with the HD offering a remote that has an "instant replay" button not found on the LT.)
In fact, the Roku LT is currently selling for $40 on Amazon -- just $5 more than the Chromecast, despite having hundreds more apps and a dedicated remote.
The current Streaming Stick is selling for $84 on Amazon at the time of this writing. Again, separating out the remote would probably knock about $30 off that price. While the added expense of the USB cable and power adapter would have to be factored in, I would hope that Roku could get closer to $50 and still make a profit. It would be tough, but not impossible.
What about Apple?
Apple doesn't currently have a dongle-based version of the Apple TV, but there's no reason that company couldn't follow this exact same gameplan. Apple TV already has YouTube; it already has remote apps; and it already has screen mirroring, with the excellent AirPlay functionality. Apple would just have to determine if it wants to go with a USB-powered dongle style design, and if the company would want to compete in a price war. Given that its $99 box has already sold more than 13 million units -- and that Apple has traditionally resisted a race to the bottom on pricing -- I wouldn't bet on this. In fact, I agree with my colleague Scott Stein, who posits that we could see the opposite -- a more robust Apple TV box that doubles as a game console. But you never know.
The ball is in Roku's court
Regardless of a curveball from Apple, Roku has a real opportunity to learn from Chromecast here. A cheaper, USB-powered Streaming Stick 2.0 would be a viable Chromecast alternative, and allow the streaming upstart to reclaim the initiative in the field that it pioneered. Best of all, the Roku engineers don't have to start from scratch -- they can just tweak the already promising Streaming Stick that's currently on the market.
Hey, it's something I'd buy for 40 or 50 bucks.

Despite warning, fans' hopes for D23 'Star Wars' news dashed

At Disney's massive fan-fest in Anaheim, 'Star Wars' fans held out hope for big news on 'Episode VII.' But Disney's warning that none was forthcoming proved true.But short of CEO Bob Iger having a press conference to declare that the company wouldn't announce anything new about the highly-anticipated next film in the series, fans came to D23 holding out hope that Disney just might still drop a hint or two about something significant. Some, for example, had predicted that the main cast of the film would be formally revealed, while others no doubt thought that Disney might talk a little about the plot.
In the end, there was no news at all, leading some in the standing-room only audience for Disney's Saturday presentation of its forthcoming live-action film slate to jeer studio Chairman Alan Horn when he said he had nothing new to share.
The speculation, in fact, reached such a fever pitch that Lucasfilm's Pablo Hidalgo, who gave a very well received talk about the history of the "Star Wars" franchise, to tweet beforehand that not only would he not have any new news to share about "Episode VII," but that Disney would also not be unveiling anything about the film at an upcoming dental convention in San Francisco.
On the other hand, Hidalgo also tweeted that the air conditioning in the Anaheim Convention Center worked fine, a nod to the fact that the recent "Star Wars" Celebration convention in Europe had not had any A/C, while 2015's Celebration, which will be held at the convention center in Anaheim, should have satisfactory climate control.
While there was no "Star Wars" news worth reporting, Disney did throw a star-studded party to celebrate its remaining slate of live-action films coming between now and early 2015.
During the presentation before thousands of Disney fans, Horn, president of motion picture production Sean Bailey, and Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige introduced a long series of forthcoming films, including "Thor: The Dark World;" "Captain America: The Winter Soldier;" "Guardians of the Galaxy;" "Cinderella;" "Maleficent;" "Muppets Most Wanted;" "Avengers: The Age of Ultron;" "Bears;" "Into the Woods;" "Tomorrowland;" and "Saving Mr. Banks."
Among the stars that turned up to help promote the various films Saturday were Angelina Jolie, Natalie Portman, Anthony Hopkins, Anthony Mackie, Tom Hiddleston, Ty Burrell, Chris Evans, and more.
The live-action presentation followed Friday's presentation of Disney's forthcoming slate of animated films, which includes three new Pixar movies, "The Good Dinosaur," "Inside Out," and "Finding Dory," among others.

Moto X or LG G2? Why specs alone aren't enough to decide

In this edition of Ask Maggie, CNET's Marguerite Reardon offers some advice on buying a new Google Android smartphone. And she suggests checking out the features and feel of the device over the specs when choosing your next high-end phoneIt seems like every week a new smartphone is introduced. Just when you think you've made up your mind, a new device hits the market.
Manufacturers are falling over themselves to outdo each other in terms of marketing their devices' technical specifications and features. But how much weight should be given to these specs anyway? And what's the best way to pick a new smartphone?
In this edition of Ask Maggie, I answer these questions and offer some advice on what to look for in a smartphone. I also take a look at four of the top Google Android smartphones in an effort to help a reader decide which one to choose.

GS4 vs. HTC One vs. Moto X vs. LG G2

Dear Maggie,
I've been waiting to see if the Moto X will knock the Samsung Galaxy S4 off its perch. I also like the looks of the HTC One. But now it looks like there are other devices to consider. So I'm wondering if there's anything else on the horizon you think would be worth waiting for? What do you think about the newly announced LG G2?
It's also a little hard to pull the trigger on a phone (the GS4) that's already four months old. But a part of me thinks that maybe it's that rare moment when a phone is the best out there and there's no likely challenger around the corner -- in which case it might make sense. I'd love to hear your thoughts on these devices.
Best,
Aaron
Dear Aaron,
The smartphone market has heated up this summer, and it's only going to get hotter in the coming months.
As you mentioned, the Samsung Galaxy S4 has been among the top picks for smartphones since it was launched in the spring, competing head-to-head with Apple's iPhone 5 and the HTC One. But now there are even more devices to consider. And even more are coming this fall.
Last week, Motorola announced the much-anticipated Moto X. This week, LG debuted its flagship device, the G2. In early September, Samsung is expected to announce its next "phablet," the Galaxy Note 3. And of course, Apple is also expected to announce the newest iPhone, that's being dubbed the iPhone 5S, in September. (Not to mention there's also the latest Nokia Windows Phone, which will soon be available to AT&T customers.)
What this means for you and other smartphone shoppers is that there will be plenty of choices within the next one to two months. So unless you are in dire need of a smartphone, I wouldn't buy anything right now. The Moto X and the LG G2 aren't even available in stores yet. So if you can, you should at least wait until they're on sale.
Why specs alone aren't enough
Now to answer your question: Do I think any of these devices rival the Samsung Galaxy S4? The short answer is "yes." I wouldn't count out any of these devices just yet. So how do you choose which of these phones is right for you?
Lots of people out there will compare devices based on specification sheets. This can be helpful, since it gives you a sense of what the device is capable of and it might ease any concerns you have about the technology quickly becoming outdated. My CNET Reviews colleague Jessica Dolcourt has already put together a post comparing the technical differences among these four devices: GS4, HTC One, LG G2, and Moto X. So be sure to check out her piece for those nitty-gritty specs.But a long laundry list of technical specifications, highlighting multicore processors, camera megapixels, battery size, and screen resolutions, only tells part of the story when picking out a phone. This is especially true right now, as so many of the devices on the market have comparable specifications.
For instance, The LG G2 and Samsung Galaxy S4 each support Android 4.2.2, a 13-megapixel camera, a 1,080-pixel HD screen, really fast quad-core processors, and an IR blaster that allows you to turn your phone into a TV remote.
Meanwhile, the HTC One and Moto X, which in some respects have slightly less impressive specs than their competitors, actually perform very similarly to them. In other words, whether a device has a 13-megapixel or a 10-megapixel camera or whether it has a quad-core processor or a dual-core processor, probably won't matter much to the average consumer when the devices are used in real life.
In fact, Iqbal Arshad, Motorola's senior vice president for product development, recently told me in an interview that he thinks consumers often don't understand what the specs mean. And he said that there's much more to building a phone than slapping a faster processor or a higher resolution screen in the device.It's hard because people are programmed by the industry to look at things like how many cores a chip has or whether the display is 1080p," he said. "That's how chip and display manufacturers differentiate their products. But we've spent thousands of engineering hours building a new kind of processing architecture that will really change how people use their phones."
Also, sometimes what you might consider higher-end specifications may degrade battery performance or some other aspect of performance. So it's difficult to make a decision based on specifications alone.
Instead, I think you should look at some of the unique features offered on each of the phones you're considering and then go to a store and see how they look and feel up close. Do these features make it easier for you to use the phone? Do they offer you a feature or function you think you'd actually use? If the answer is yes, then you should definitely consider those factors along with the speeds and feeds of the device you might buy.
The smartphones
Here's a summary of what I think you should consider about each of the four devices you mentioned in your question.
Samsung Galaxy S4: This is a solid all-around good smartphone. There are tons of software bells and whistles on this device. But to be honest, none of them really sticks out as a must-have. The biggest advantage the GS4 has right now is that it's probably the best known and widely available smartphone on the market besides the iPhone.The GS4 is available from every major carrier, and now even some of the prepaid carriers are offering the device. Because it's Samsung's flagship it should be getting the latest version of Android 4.3 relatively soon, but this is likely to vary greatly based on carrier. In a nutshell, this is a good phone with top specs, good performance, but no true standout features that change anything about how I use a smartphone.
HTC One: There are three things that really make the HTC One stand out from the rest of the smartphones on the market. The first is the look and feel of the device. The all-aluminum body is slick. And even though the HTC One doesn't offer as many megapixels on its camera as the LG G2, Moto X, or Samsung Galaxy S4, it does offer some cool software features that make the device exceptional in terms of the camera. It's too hard to say right now how the camera stacks up to the Moto X and LG G2, since those phones aren't available yet. But I'd definitely want to compare them before making my decision.
I also like the HTC Sense software. Unlike the Samsung TouchWiz software, which I'm not a fan of, HTC Sense actually seems to make using the device easier. I also like the fact that the HTC One starts at 32GB of storage on the device. It doesn't have an expandable memory card slot, which is fine with me, so long as it has adequate on-device storage -- and I think 32GB is likely enough for most smartphone users.
Motorola Moto X: If you looked at the spec sheet alone, you might be inclined to discard the Moto X as not even in the same class as these other devices. But I'd argue that this would be a mistake. As my interview with Motorola's top engineer earlier this week makes clear, Motorola has spent a lot of engineering hours designing a device that not only looks good and feels good in your hand but also performs as well or possibly better than the competition without having the same high-end specs.
After months of leaked details, loads of speculation, and plenty of waiting, the Moto X was unveiled. And the new smartphone will be on all four wireless carriers later this month, for $200 with a two-year contract.
(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)
For example, something that people don't realize is that superhigh-resolution screens and multicore processors often drain battery life more on devices. And that can be a big flaw in a smartphone. I've been using the Moto X for a week, and the company's claims of a full 24-hour battery life, at least in my experience, rings true. In fact, I've been able to go into a second day on the same battery charge with this phone, something I haven't ever been able to do with any of the Samsung Galaxy S devices I've used, including the GS4.
Aside from the longer battery life, the marquee features for the Moto X are all about being "always on." One of the biggest features are the devices' "touchless controls," which allow you to conduct Google searches, make phone calls, and access the navigation app just by talking using the magic words: "OK, Google Now..." Another touchless control feature allows you to access the camera with a couple of twists of your wrist. This wakes up the camera, even if your device is asleep and locked. I also like that you can get the time and check message status while your device is in sleep mode, which is another aspect of the "always on" capability of the device.Another thing many people will likely appreciate about the Moto X is that it's not loaded up with a lot of additional bloatware software. It's truly the closest you're likely to come to a pure Google Android phone outside the Nexus line of products. This is important because it should help make upgrading software on the device in the future much easier than it would be with the GS4 or HTC One. The only negative I see about this device is the fact that the version that will be first available on all the carrier networks has only 16GB of device storage, without any expandable memory card slot.
LG G2: In terms of specs, the LG G2 is king of the hill for the moment. It has the fastest quad-core processor, biggest battery, and largest and highest resolution HD screen of all the high-end devices announced thus far. But as I've said before, specs tell only part of the story. There are a few standout features on this device that you should consider when evaluating it in comparison with the others.
The first is a design feature. LG has put the On and Off button and volume controls on the back of the device. The company claims this is a more comfortable and natural way to access these controls than either hitting a button on the top or sides of the device. Personally, I don't think it matters much where the buttons are in terms of turning the device on and off and adjusting the volume.
But what I do like about having those buttons on the back of the device is that when the camera app is activated, it makes it a bit easier to take photos, especially selfies using the front-facing camera. Tapping a camera icon on the front screen of most smartphones is usually kind of awkward for me. I much prefer having an actual button to click. And surprisingly having that button on the back of the G2 is actually a comfortable place for it when you are taking photos.
LG G2
(Credit: LG)
The G2 also comes with a few other interesting and seemingly useful software features, too. For instance, it allows you to set up a "guest mode" for your device. This could be especially useful for parents who may not want to give their kids full access to their smartphones, but instead can customize a "kid setting" that shows only apps that the kids can access.
I also like the Text Link feature, which allows you to save information from a text message to your calendar or a memo. The Answer Me feature that lets you answer the phone by picking it up and holding it to your ear when it rings is also kind of nifty. And I like the KnockOn feature that lets you unlock the device by tapping the screen twice.
What should you do?
The bottom line is that each of these smartphones has something to offer. And they're all worthy of consideration. But your ultimate decision will be based on your personal taste. It's like buying a car. Some people like Hondas while others prefer Toyotas or Mazdas. For the most part, when you're looking at smartphones today, they all have the same basic performance, which makes it hard to base your decision on the nitty-gritty technical details alone.
But when you look at the special unique features and you actually hold the devices in your hand at the store and play around with the settings and features, you'll walk away with a better idea of what you like and what you don't like.
For instance, the Moto X has a sharp, 4.7 inch screen. But the body of the device is noticeably smaller than that of any of the other devices. Some people will love this, while others may not. Similarly, some people may love the back buttons on the LG G2, while others may find them awkward and irritating. And then there are those folks who simply love the look and feel of the aluminum HTC One, while others are annoyed at how easily it scratches.
The truth is that I don't think you can go terribly wrong with choosing any of these devices. Unless you're the type of person who's bored with your new device within a few months anyway, I think most people could be easily satisfied with the look, feel, and performance of any of these smartphones for the next couple of years.
But as I said earlier in this post, there are still more devices to be launched in the next couple of months. So it's probably best to hold off on making your final decision until these other devices are announced and you've had a chance to check them out for yourself in a store.
I hope this advice is helpful. And good luck!
Ask Maggie is an advice column that answers readers' wireless and broadband questions. The column now appears twice a week on CNET offering readers a double dosage of Ask Maggie's advice. If you have a question, I'd love to hear from you. Please send me an e-mail at maggie dot reardon at cbs dot com. And please put "Ask Maggie" in the subject header. You can also follow me on Facebook 

NASA sounds the alarm on fire risks of climate change

The space agency releases an animation that dramatically shows how the risk of fire may increase in North America throughout the century.Much has been said about the danger of increasingly intense hurricanes due to climate change -- a concern that entered the public consciousness in a big way with Katrina's devastation of New Orleans and continued late last year with Hurricane Sandy's ravaging of the Eastern Seaboard.
But swirling storms of wind and water aren't the only hazard. Now NASA is raising the alarm about fire.
The space agency released an animation this week, based on satellite and climate data, that dramatically shows how the risk of fire may increase in North America throughout the century.
With warmer spring temperatures and earlier snow melt, dry conditions are increasing, which means fire seasons are starting earlier and lasting longer, and bigger fires are becoming more common.
"A 100,000-acre wildfire used to be unusual, you would see one every few years," Forest Service employee Carl Albury is quoted as saying in an article on NASA's Web site. "Those type of fires are becoming a yearly occurrence."
Click through the brief slideshow below to check out the animation and learn about NASA's fire-spotting efforts.

Apple to unveil new iPhone September 10?

Apple to unveil new iPhone September 10?

That's what sources tell All Things Digital. Also: New pictures appear of the iPhone 5S and 5C -- if, in fact, the pix are the real deal.Come September 10, the current iPhone rumor season will end and a new one will begin. That's because that's the day Apple will unveil the next incarnation of its iconic device -- that is, if All Things D's unnamed sources have it right.
ATD's Ina Fried reported the date late Saturday, adding that the unveiling of Apple's Mac OS X, aka Mavericks, isn't expected at the purported September 10 event, and that there's no indication that an Apple television or smartwatch project is "close to debuting."
In other iPhone news, SlashGear posted photos from Vietnamese site Tinh te that allegedly show case-maker dummy models of the upcoming iPhone 5S and the rumored low-cost iPhone 5C. SlashGear writes:
 As expected, the iPhone 5S appears nearly identical to the iPhone 5 save several small distinctions. The first is the previously rumored dual-LED flash on the back of the iPhone 5S. Where every iPhone that's had a back-facing flash thus far has used a single bulb, this next-generation device is aiming to up the ante with a double-dose of bright light.
iPhone obsessives will find even more "small distinctions" listed , along with more pictures. And you can check out CNET's wishlist for the next iPhone